Program Development and Program Evaluation

Sponsor: Brady Education Foundation
Solicitation Title: Program Development and Program Evaluation
Funding Amount: Unspecified. In the past, the Foundation has preferred requests of $100,000 or less per year for a maximum of three years. Duration of Program Development grants is up to one year. Duration of Existing Program Evaluation grants is up to three years. The Foundation will support up to two key personnel from the evaluation team and one practitioner or service provider from the program to attend one conference the last (or only) year of the project, with an allowable cost of $1,500 per person.
Sponsor Deadline: Friday, April 1, 2016
Solicitation Link: http://www.bradyeducationfoundation.org/applicationguidelines.html
Solicitation Number: N/A

Overview

<p><span>The Brady Education Foundation seeks to close the achievement/opportunity gap for children at risk for poor school outcomes due to environmental factors associated with living in poverty. The Foundation pursues its mission by promoting collaboration between researchers and educators via the funding of program development and program evaluations in education. Currently, the Foundation is particularly focused on the development and evaluation of programs that are consistent with a strength-based approach and show promise of being feasible, effective and sustainable. </span></p> <p><span>The Foundation funds two types of projects: </span></p> <p><span>1. Program Development </span></p> <p><span>Goal: Develop and test the feasibility of new programs for promoting positive cognitive and/or achievement outcomes for children (birth through 18 years) from underserved groups and/or low-resourced communities (minority ethnic groups, low-income families).<br></span>The Foundation favors projects that:<br>- Represent strong collaborative relationships between researchers and practitioners, and other community stakeholders as appropriate; <br>- Develop programs consistent with strength-based approaches rather than deficit models; <br>- Leverage other funding;<br> - Develop programs that, in addition to showing promise of being effective, show promise of being affordable, accessible and sustainable. <br>- Consider the specific and unique assets and needs of children from underserved populations and/or low-resourced communities (e.g., minority ethnic groups, low-income communities). Concerning race and ethnicity, the Foundation seeks to increase understanding of what works best for children from diverse racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds (e.g., African American, Latino, Native American).</p> <p>2. Existing Program Evaluation</p> <p>Goal: Primary goal:<br>a. What works: Evaluate the effectiveness of programs designed to promote positive cognitive and/or achievement outcomes for children (birth through 18 years) from underserved groups and/or low-resourced communities (minority ethnic groups, low-income families).</p> <p>Secondary goals may include: <br>b. What works for whom, under what conditions: Investigate variations in program effects; that is, test for moderation effects that inform whether program effects are stronger for certain groups and/or under certain conditions than other groups or conditions. <br>c. Reasons for effects: Investigate mechanisms through which effects occur; that is, test for mediation effects that inform why the program is effective. <br>d. Cost-benefit analyses: Compare the total costs of the program with its estimated monetary benefts to determine the net cost or benefit associated with the program.</p> <p>The Foundation favors projects that:<br>- Represent strong collaborative relationships between researchers and practitioners, and other community stakeholders as appropriate; <br>- Evaluate programs consistent with strength-based approaches rather than deficit models; <br>- Projects for which operational funding for the program is already secured so that funding from the Foundation is used only for evaluation activities; <br>- Evaluate programs that show promise of being affordable, accessible and sustainable; <br>- Projects that employ randomized control designs (including wait-list control designs when assignment to wait-list condition is randomized). Comparison group designs may also be employed when strong efforts are made to control for potential confounding variables (e.g., due to selection effects). The Foundation rarely funds evaluation projects that employ neither randomized control nor comparison group designs;<br>- Projects that evaluate effects on measurable child outcomes.<br> - Consider the specific and unique assets and needs of children from underserved populations and/or low-resourced communities (e.g., minority ethnic groups, low-income communities). Concerning race and ethnicity, the Foundation seeks to increase understanding of what works best for children from diverse racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds </p>

Solicitation Limitations: <p><span>The Foundation does not fund:<br></span>- Scholarships <br>- Capital projects <br>- Projects outside of the United States <br>- Evaluations conducted by for-profit organizations or the development of programs intended to become for-profit entities <br>- Program development and evaluation for children at risk for poor cognitive and academic outcomes due to medical conditions (including developmental delays or disabilities associated with biological causes) or substance abuse<br>- Support for scaling up programs already found to be effective <br>- Continuing education for providers</p> Other Information:<p><span>Interested applicants should go through the ASU Foundation. The Brady Education Foundation caps indirect costs for both primary institutions and subcontracts at 10% of the direct costs of the project. Primary institution may NOT charge additional indirect on subcontract funds. The Foundation follows National Institutes of Health guidelines for salary caps and travel (including conference travel).</span></p>


Last Updated:
RODA ID: 84